AI in Procurement: ADF Test
- ukrsedo
- Mar 5
- 4 min read
Updated: Mar 9
ADF Test and Its Application in Procurement
When analysing procurement data, we often assume that past trends and patterns will help us forecast the future. But what if those trends are unreliable, drifting over time without a stable pattern?
That's where the Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) Test comes in. This statistical test helps determine whether a data series is stationary (meaning it has a consistent statistical property over time) or non-stationary (meaning trends or seasonality may influence the data unpredictably).
Does Stationarity Mean Fluctuations Around a Mean?
Stationarity implies that a time series fluctuates around some constant mean or variance over time, without a long-term trend.

In contrast, non-stationary data exhibits trends, seasonality, or changing variances, making historical patterns unreliable for forecasting.

Why Does Stationarity Matter in Procurement?
Procurement teams rely on historical data for demand forecasting, supplier performance analysis, and cost trend evaluations. A stationary series makes it easier for statistical models to predict effectively and precisely. However, forecasts based on past values may be misleading if the data is non-stationary.
For example, let's consider supplier lead times. If historical lead times show a steady upward drift due to worsening logistics conditions, using past averages for future planning could result in stockouts or rushed orders with high premiums.
Applying the ADF test can help procurement colleagues determine whether a given dataset is stable enough for forecasting or requires transformations (like differencing) to remove trends and make it stationary.
How the ADF Test Works
The ADF test checks whether a time series has a unit root, which is a complex way of saying whether the data exhibits a trend that makes it non-stationary.
It does this by testing the null hypothesis that the time series has a unit root (i.e., is non-stationary).
If the p-value is below a certain threshold (typically 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude the series is stationary.
Don't be afraid, you won't need to remember all that. The outcome of the ADF test looks more or less like this:
"Interpreting the Results:
ADF Statistic: This value helps determine the presence of a unit root in the time series. A more negative value indicates stronger evidence against the presence of a unit root, suggesting the series is stationary.
p-value: This value indicates the probability that the series is non-stationary. A p-value less than 0.05 typically suggests rejecting the null hypothesis (the series is stationary).
Based on the provided data, the ADF test results are:
ADF Statistic: -1.95
p-value: 0.30
Given the p-value is above 0.05, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the LME Copper prices for 2024 are likely non-stationary."
The ADF Test Formula
You can easily find that formula, and the purpose of this post isn't to copy-paste it for the scientific appeal.
Why all the hassle?
In procurement, non-stationary data typically means higher uncertainty and risk, requiring more agile and dynamic procurement strategies.
If the Data is Stationary
Reliable Forecasting – Standard statistical forecasting models (e.g., ARMA, ARIMA) work effectively.
Consistent Analysis – Historical trends remain relevant for future decision-making.
Stable Demand Patterns – Procurement strategies can rely on historical consumption data for inventory planning.
Price Predictability – Supplier pricing trends remain stable, enabling long-term contract negotiations.
If the Data is Non-Stationary
Advanced forecasting is required. Transformations (differencing, log transformations) or models like ARIMA must be applied.
Unstable Supplier Performance Trends – Requires deeper investigation into external factors affecting variability.
Changing Demand Patterns – Procurement needs flexible contracts and adaptive inventory management.
Market Volatility Impact – Procurement strategies must account for inflation, currency fluctuations, and supply chain disruptions.
Real-life example: Augmented Dickey-Fuller (ADF) Test on Brent Crude Oil Prices.
To assess the stationarity of Brent crude oil prices over the past 365 days, Chat GPT conducted the ADF test using daily closing prices from March 4, 2024, to March 4, 2025. The data was sourced from Yahoo Finance.
ADF Test Results:
Test Statistic: -1.892
p-value: 0.337
Critical Values:
1% level: -3.436
5% level: -2.864
10% level: -2.568
Interpretation:
The p-value (0.337) is greater than the common significance levels (0.01, 0.05, 0.10), indicating that we fail to reject the null hypothesis of a unit root. This suggests that the Brent crude oil price series is non-stationary over the examined period.
Since the ADF test statistic (-1.892) is above critical values, we fail to reject the null hypothesis, confirming that the Brent crude oil price series is non-stationary.
AI is a chest of treasures.
ADF test on crude oil prices somehow explains why airlines don't usually create oil reserves. They hedge, negotiate short-term contracts, and buy in the spot market.
This study demonstrates some reasoning behind that.
Generally, I won't have been doing the ADF test, as I don't know Python.
But now you can collect the data of your interest and feed it to any instance of AI you're using. You will receive the outcome immediately, to support or disapprove your sourcing decision or a category strategy. No programming skills or mathematical background required!
Isn't that a charm?
Comments